UC means that a particular line in a lab report is uncoded, but it could have a code linked to the term written on the line. The UC hyperlink allows a user to add a code to the report, but this can be dangerous if used incorrectly, and only clinicians should use this feature. When a line is linked on a report, the change will be made for every subsequent inbound report, but earlier reports remain in the state they arrived.
Adding a code is quite simple; press the UC hyperlink, then press the spyglass and search for a code. Once the code is selected to you do have an opportunity to review and cancel if necessary.
We can see an example of what happens in two (modified) images of results below. These are results for FIT tests which came into the site from the same laboratory approximately 2 years apart.
In the first image from 2020 we can read the result, but we would never be able to search on it. There are some clues which can tell us that this report was uncoded; the test name is in italics and there are some blue UC hyperlinks on the right of certain rows. Sometimes the tests will be shown in CAPITAL LETTERS, which will also be evident when reading a result in the patient's Care History.
The second image from 2022 has some subtle differences, notably the absence of several UC hyperlinks but also the test name has changed from Faecal Immunochemical Test to Quantitv faecal immunochem tst. Notice also that (47K) appears in place of the previous UC hyperlink. The Read code 47K is mapped to 1049361000000101 SNOMED concept ID.
What has happened in the intervening period is that somebody pressed UC and mapped the Quantitive faecal immunochemical test code to the result, or the lab added the code at their end, or both.
Lines such as Comment are completely separate to the result so they wouldn't be initially associated with the result. It is not necessary to add a code to this line.
The same could be said for the test titles in the line above the result, however from the point of view of searches there are certain sets of results where linking a code to the title can be very useful; Full blood count and Urea and electrolytes are probably the most common examples as they are collective terms for a series of results.
Take a look at some other lab reports and notice how many of them will have (4...) on the right hand side plus some UC hyperlinks.
2. What can I do about previous uncoded reports?
Aside from missing the trendline functionality, it probably doesn't matter much from a clinician's perspective that some results are not coded as it is still possible to search for text within a record. Some QOF, local enhanced services, and the National Contract DES (IIF) contain rules which look for coded results. It is therefore important for these that certain types of test result are correctly coded.
Having identified and matched a code going forward, there isn't a lot you can do automatically code reports retrospectively. A suggested workaround is to view the lab reports archive in Workflow Manager - you do not have to be a global viewer to see everything.
Press the Report column to sort by report name. EMIS may hang for a few moments as it thinks, then use the page navigator in the bottom left hand corner to locate the type of report you want. Each page has 50 reports so start off by making some big jumps of hundreds of pages, then refining by tens of pages until you find the range you want. Aside from being sorted alphabetically by report name they should also be sorted chronologically within each range of reports.
Once the range has been identified it is possible to work through the reports and add a code - if you have already mapped a line with UC for a recent result, you can actually use the UC button on each archived report to link a code - JUST MAKE SURE THE SAME CODE IS USED EVERY TIME!
The alternative approach is to print a list of all the patients you wish to add a code to, then manually add it on the same date as the report. Your Practice can make a decision over how far back to update, but consider that only the current NHS year is likely to be of benefit to achievement metrics. Whilst this second approach will look less tidy in the record, any mistakes made during the coding exercise can be more easily rolled back.
Batch adding is not advisable since timing of reports can be critical to achieving some QOF/ES/IIF indicators.
3. What reports have had codes linked on the site?
If a code has been linked by somebody at the site, it can be changed in Workflow Config. All users should be able to see the button but only those with the appropriate RBAC code B1700 will be able to manage the Organisation Options.